C++ Operator Precedence
The following table lists the precedence and associativity of C++ operators. Operators are listed top to bottom, in descending precedence.
Precedence | Operator | Description | Associativity |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ::
|
Scope resolution | Left-to-right |
2 | ++ --
|
Suffix/postfix increment and decrement | |
type() type{}
|
Functional cast | ||
()
|
Function call | ||
[]
|
Subscript | ||
. ->
|
Member access | ||
3 | ++ --
|
Prefix increment and decrement | Right-to-left |
+ -
|
Unary plus and minus | ||
! ~
|
Logical NOT and bitwise NOT | ||
(type)
|
C-style cast | ||
*
|
Indirection (dereference) | ||
&
|
Address-of | ||
sizeof
|
Size-of[note 1] | ||
new new[]
|
Dynamic memory allocation | ||
delete delete[]
|
Dynamic memory deallocation | ||
4 | .* ->*
|
Pointer-to-member | Left-to-right |
5 | * / %
|
Multiplication, division, and remainder | |
6 | + -
|
Addition and subtraction | |
7 | << >>
|
Bitwise left shift and right shift | |
8 | < <=
|
For relational operators < and ≤ respectively | |
> >=
|
For relational operators > and ≥ respectively | ||
9 | == !=
|
For relational operators = and ≠ respectively | |
10 | &
|
Bitwise AND | |
11 | ^
|
Bitwise XOR (exclusive or) | |
12 | |
|
Bitwise OR (inclusive or) | |
13 | &&
|
Logical AND | |
14 | ||
|
Logical OR | |
15 | ?:
|
Ternary conditional[note 2] | Right-to-left |
throw
|
throw operator | ||
=
|
Direct assignment (provided by default for C++ classes) | ||
+= -=
|
Compound assignment by sum and difference | ||
*= /= %=
|
Compound assignment by product, quotient, and remainder | ||
<<= >>=
|
Compound assignment by bitwise left shift and right shift | ||
&= ^= |=
|
Compound assignment by bitwise AND, XOR, and OR | ||
16 | ,
|
Comma | Left-to-right |
-
↑ The operand of
sizeof
can't be a C-style type cast: the expressionsizeof (int) * p
is unambiguously interpreted as(sizeof(int)) * p
, but notsizeof((int)*p)
. -
↑ The expression in the middle of the conditional operator (between
?
and:
) is parsed as if parenthesized: its precedence relative to?:
is ignored.
When parsing an expression, an operator which is listed on some row of the table above with a precedence will be bound tighter (as if by parentheses) to its arguments than any operator that is listed on a row further below it with a lower precedence. For example, the expressions std::cout << a & b and *p++ are parsed as (std::cout << a) & b and *(p++), and not as std::cout << (a & b) or (*p)++.
Operators that have the same precedence are bound to their arguments in the direction of their associativity. For example, the expression a = b = c is parsed as a = (b = c), and not as (a = b) = c because of right-to-left associativity of assignment, but a + b - c is parsed (a + b) - c and not a + (b - c) because of left-to-right associativity of addition and subtraction.
Associativity specification is redundant for unary operators and is only shown for completeness: unary prefix operators always associate right-to-left (delete ++*p is delete(++(*p))) and unary postfix operators always associate left-to-right (a[1][2]++ is ((a[1])[2])++). Note that the associativity is meaningful for member access operators, even though they are grouped with unary postfix operators: a.b++ is parsed (a.b)++ and not a.(b++))
Operator precedence is unaffected by operator overloading.
[edit] Notes
Precedence and associativity are compile-time concepts and are independent from order of evaluation, which is a runtime concept.
The standard itself doesn't specify precedence levels. They are derived from the grammar.
const_cast, static_cast, dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, typeid, sizeof..., noexcept and alignof are not included since they are never ambiguous.
Some of the operators have alternate spellings (e.g., and for &&
, or for ||
, not for !
, etc.).
Relative precedence of the ternary conditional and assignment operators differs between C and C++: in C, assignment is not allowed on the right-hand side of a ternary conditional operator, so e = a < d ? a++ : a = d cannot be parsed. Many C compilers use a modified grammar where ?:
has higher precedence than =
, which parses that as e = ( ((a < d) ? (a++) : a) = d ) (which then fails to compile because ?:
is never lvalue in C and =
requires lvalue on the left). In C++, ?:
and =
have equal precedence and group right-to-left, so that e = a < d ? a++ : a = d parses as e = ((a < d) ? (a++) : (a = d)).
[edit] See also
Common operators | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
assignment | increment decrement |
arithmetic | logical | comparison | member access |
other |
a = b |
++a |
+a |
!a |
a == b |
a[b] |
a(...) |
Special operators | ||||||
static_cast converts one type to another related type |
C documentation for C operator precedence
|